When the critically-acclaimed movie “2001: A Space Odyssey” came out in 1968, a novel with the same name was being written simultaneously alongside it. However, because both were published in the same year, the movie overshadowed the book. Film enthusiasts came to praise the film and it eventually became known as one of the greatest movies of all time. But what about the novel? Does the story hold up in written-form, or should it have not been created at all?
I recently read the novel after having seen the movie multiple times. Personally, I think that this is a time where the movie is actually better than the book. While the book is still very interesting and exciting, the movie allows for Stanley Kubrick’s vision to shine through.
One thing “2001” is known for is its psychedelic and disorienting visuals. Throughout the movie, the screen shows flashing colors, dream-like sets and trippy perspectives. This is what makes it such a cult classic. It is also why I am inspired by and love the movie so much.
However, the book’s descriptions are unable to compare to any effects used in the film. Because it uses written words, readers are not able to get an image such as the ones Kubrick implemented in the movie. None of the confusing, colorful scenes are described to their full extent. Instead, each part of the story is fully explained, removing the mystery of what “2001” is truly about.
Some may argue that the simpleness of the book lets readers know more about the plot of the story. While it does make everything less convoluted, it also takes away from the real experience of watching the movie.
One reason I love the film is because viewers have to watch it multiple times to fully understand everything. The book just explains why each plot point happens, and it is disappointing. I do, however, really recommend reading the book after watching the movie. If someone has already seen it, the novel will help them fully grasp each concept of the plot.
Another reason that the movie is better is its portrayal of the main villain, HAL 9000. This is the Artificial Intelligence that runs the spaceship in the story. I love how he is written in the film and I think he adds another layer of horror and complexity to the plot. In the novel, he lacks a true villainous personality and just seems like he was added to the book for no reason. He is not as ominous and threatening as he is in the movie. Again, HAL’s portrayal takes away from Kubrick’s vision and the creativity of the story.
Overall, while both renditions are great in their own aspects, the movie is far better. It shows the original creative vision amazingly, and definitely deserves its reputation. While I do wish more people knew about the novel version, I do not think it should be read instead of watching the movie.
